Contrary to all the Chevron-funded billboards, mailers, door hangers, and TV commercials, Gayle McLaughlin has worked long and hard for Richmond, in Richmond. According to a recent Richmond Confidential article, "an analysis of city documents, invoices, travel receipts and bank statements dating to 2010 shows that McLaughlin has traveled less, missed fewer meetings, and spent less money on the trips than City Councilman Nat Bates, a longtime supporter of the oil giant's mammoth refinery here and the Chevron-backed committee's favored candidate for mayor."
Bates outspent our mayor about 3:1 on travel, in terms of both time and money. Apparently his own position on frequent and international trips differs from the stance in his patron's ads; he is quoted in the article: "You can't accomplish things staying at home, and not engaging with global community." All this has led Tom Butt, who is running against Bates for mayor, to conclude that "the Chevron-funded campaign to paint McLaughlin as a frequent traveler who has eschewed her responsibilities is hypocritical."
Andrew Young in Richmond
Prophet of Urban Renewal or Big Oil’s Reverend for Rent?
by Steve Early
In his remarkable six decade career in public life, 82-year old Andy Young has been many things to many people: civil rights movement minister and courageous ally of Dr. Martin Luther King, Democratic Congressman from Georgia, U.S. emissary to the United Nations under President Jimmy Carter, two-term mayor of Atlanta in the 1980s, and then leader of the National Council of Churches.
On Monday night, he appeared before a largely African-American crowd at a "community dinner" in Richmond. It was sponsored by a 501 (c) (4) organization known as For Richmond, which dispenses grants to local non-profits like the YMCA. Young’s appearance showcased his most recent incarnation as a skilled, if not uncontroversial, friend of private enterprise, including some of the biggest firms in the world. The timing of his visit was not unrelated to Richmond’s upcoming municipal elections.
Town Meeting for Economic Justice
Senator Bernie Sanders Rallies Richmond’s Progressives
by Harriet Rowan
Senator Bernie Sanders (VT-I), a potential 2016 presidential candidate, delivered a rousing speech to an overflowing audience in Richmond on Thursday. His speech focused on the growing economic inequality in the United States and argued for the importance of electing candidates who will implement progressive policies in the face of the growing influence of big money in politics.
"At this profound moment in American history, where the billionaire class wants to get it all... we have got to fight back tooth and nail," Sanders said, drawing boisterous applause from a crowd of about 500. "We cannot allow them to take over Richmond... we cannot allow them to take over America."
Sanders was invited to Richmond by Mayor Gayle McLaughlin to help rally her progressive base in the face of $3 million in spending by Chevron Corp. to oppose McLaughlin and her allies in the Nov. 4 election.
Also see Richmond Confidential's multimedia report on the Bernie Sanders Town Meeting:
Richmond in the National Media Spotlight
Chevron Trying to Buy Richmond’s Government
Since Rachel Maddow decried Chevron's interference in Richmond politics, numerous national media voices have featured Chevron vs. Richmond as an example of corporate cash dominating American elections:
Show Your Friends and Neighbors
Team Richmond Videos
Can Money Buy Your Vote?
Is Richmond’s Election for Sale?
Chevron is on track to spend between $2 and $3 million trying to gain control of the Richmond City Council on Election Day. The corporation will likely pay out $120 per voter—and that’s just the reported expenditures. The other candidates will be lucky to spend one-tenth as much, combined.
Two million dollars buys a lot of billboards, mailers, door knocking and phone-banking. Plus lots of hit pieces on candidates Chevron doesn’t like. It isn’t fair. But it is legal, so this election will be a real test of the power of money in our democracy.
Why does Chevron want to own the Council?
The number one reason is the City’s lawsuit against Chevron over the August 2012 fire and its prior history of accidents.
Chevron and our next City Council will likely settle the case to avoid a trial. The City has hired the same law firm that won $70 million for the town of San Bruno after the 2010 PG&E pipeline explosion.
If Richmond and its lawyers negotiate well, we could see a settlement of more than $100 million—for the costs of the fire to Richmond and the damage to our reputation and property values over the last 20 years.
But a new, Chevron-friendly City Council could settle cheap—and save the company many times what it’s spending on this election.
Does it have a right?
The second reason Chevron wants to control the council is to preserve its “right” to pollute our air. A progressive City Council could work closely with the Bay Area Air Quality Management District. We could make Chevron clean up its act over the next ten years, by truly modernizing the refinery.
But Chevron is determined to prevent that.
Third, Chevron loves its sweet deal for low property taxes and doesn’t want any interference.
Remember, when Chevron wants to start a new project, it has to get city approval. That gives the people of Richmond bargaining power. Chevron wants to own both sides of the bargaining table.
Reprinted from the premiere edition of The Richmond Sun (2.5 MB PDF).
A Letter from Mayor McLaughlin
Richmond is Better Now
In the last eight years that I’ve been privileged to be your mayor, we’ve come a long way from our history of scarcity and despair. Richmond has gained national attention as a community courageous enough to define its own destiny.
Residents from every corner of the city are saying: Richmond is better now.
If you agree, please join with me, Jovanka Beckles and Eduardo Martinez to:
Powerful special interests, like Chevron, may fight us every step of the way, but we stand strong with our community to create prosperity, peace and health for every Richmond resident.
National Luminaries Pitching In
Sanders, Kucinich Rally for East Bay Progressives
by Steve Early
If you’re Gayle McLaughlin, the Green mayor of Richmond, now termed out but running for city council, or Dan Siegel, the radical labor lawyer challenging an incumbent mayor in Oakland, who can rally the troops better than a former mayor who was a pioneering municipal reformer?
Both candidates hope to generate some home-stretch campaign energy, with the help of such invited out-of-town guests, at public forums and related fundraisers in their respective East Bay bailiwicks next week.
On Oct. 16, McLaughlin is hosting Bernie Sanders, former four-term mayor of Burlington, Vermont, at a "Town Meeting" in Richmond, preceded by a reception at her downtown campaign headquarters. Two days later in Oakland, Siegel is bringing in Dennis Kucinich, a one-term mayor of Cleveland, to speak at two similar events, one of which also features Tom Hayden, a leading progressive activist in the 1960s and longtime legislator in Sacramento.
Big Money Influence on Local Politics
Chevron Wants to Buy My Vote
by David Helvarg
If corporations are people then one of them has been stalking me.
When humans think about the Supreme Court's Citizens United ruling that corporations are people and money is free speech, and about the impact unlimited campaign spending is having on our democracy, they tend to think too big. The most significant consequences may not be at the national or state level but in cities where elections can determine decisions about property taxes, land-use permits and zoning that have a direct effect on people’s lives and on companies' bottom lines...
Until 2008, when a group of candidates calling themselves the Progressive Alliance won seats, Richmond's City Council was dominated by a refinery-friendly majority known by some as the Chevron Five. Now the oil giant is trying to turn Richmond back into a company town where elected officials don’t force it to pay more property taxes, or demand transparent environmental impact reports or challenge it on pollution and local hiring practices.
Richmond Confidential on Chevron’s Political Spending
Chevron’s Moving Forward Spreads Big Money across Political Campaign Committees
by Harriet Rowan
Chevron Richmond poured at least $1.26 million into the Richmond mayoral and city council races between Aug. 14 and Sept. 29, funneling the money through three campaign committees, all with iterations of the name "Moving Forward."
According to documents filed with the Richmond City Clerk, Moving Forward’s campaign committee, created in 2012, transferred at least $1.9 million as of Sept. 17 to two newly-created committees. The amount transferred exceeds the $1.7 million cash on hand figure that was widely reported after the last filing deadline on June 30. Moving Forward has likely received additional money from Chevron or other sources. The next campaign filing deadline is Oct. 6.
The two new committees have spent a combined total of at least $1,268,688.17 so far, with over a month remaining before the Nov. 4 election.
See Richmond Confidential's follow-up story:
Also see Michael Hiltzik's story in the LA Times:
East Bay Express on the Mayoral Race
The Battle for Richmond’s Soul
by John Geluardi
Richmond voters have three mayoral candidates to choose from this November, but the race is really between Tom Butt and Nat Bates, two men who have a combined 54 years of service on the city council — and polar-opposite visions for the city's future. Bates is considered the most conservative member of the council and is a strong backer of Chevron and its massive oil refinery, while Butt has a long history of promoting good government policies and challenging Chevron's sphere of influence in the city. Butt is not as liberal as the council's progressive faction, although he frequently votes with it...
Whether it's Bates or Butt, Richmond's next mayor could face a serious budget shortfall, along with rising pension costs. The new mayor also will have to deal with a city council that has developed a reputation for petty bickering and unruliness. Furthermore, the coming election will determine if Chevron will regain control of the city's political structure. The multinational oil giant is spending at least $1.6 million to elect Bates and three council candidates.
Richmond Rising III, Pitching In for Team Richmond
Forty Canvassers Went Out on Saturday, Sept. 20
Here's the crowd of volunteers who spent their Saturday morning canvassing for Team Richmond. They partnered up and went to neighborhoods that hadn't yet seen a lot of walkin', knockin' 'n' talkin' for Eduardo, Jovanka, and Gayle.
Many returned for a lunch together at 1pm, highlighted by a talk from Richmond author and activist David Helvarg, who said he'll "believe that corporations are people when Texas puts one on death row."
If you're willing and able to take on an area in your neighborhood to canvass regularly, that's ideal. If you're willing to give an hour or two once or twice, that would also help. Either way, please get in touch: email us or sign up online. If you want a partner, there are seasoned canvassers to meet and walk with you, available most days from 4-6, and on weekends. There's a briefing every Saturday at 9 at BBPC, 1021 Macdonald, near Richmond BART. No wheels are necessary.
Join the Team!
Activist Resources for the November Election
Know Your Candidates
There are two poles of power in this country: corporations and people.*
Here are some resources to counter the intense offense mounted by Moving Forward ("Major Funding by Chevron"):
* Both quotes are from David Helvarg, Sept. 20, speaking at Richmond Rising III.
Beyond Chron on Chevron Smears
Chevron Sounds Alarm Against East Bay “Anarchism”
by Steve Early
One of the great things about living near Chevron’s big East Bay refinery—yes, the one that caught fire and exploded two years ago—is its system of early warnings about new disasters about to befall Richmond.
In our post-Citizens United era, the nation’s second largest oil producer is now free to spend $1.6 million (or more, if necessary) on direct mail and phone alerts, designed to keep 30,000 likely voters fully informed about threats to their city.
During the last week, glossy mailers from a Chevron-funded group called “Moving Forward” have been flowing our way, at the rate of one or two per day—almost seven weeks before Election Day.
And, then, just to make sure that Chevron’s urgent message is getting through, we’ve also been called by pollsters. They claim to be surveying opinion about Richmond politics, but actually just recite the contents of these same Moving Forward mailers over the phone.
My favorite manifestation of this negative campaigning involves a Latino candidate for Richmond City council. His name is Eduardo Martinez and remembering the Eduardo part is important. By some strange coincidence, Moving Forward—the Chevron-backed “Coalition of Labor Unions, Small Businesses, Public Safety and Firefighters Associations”—is backing another Martinez for city council whose first name is Al and who is apparently not a public safety threat.
From KPFA’s Up Front, Friday, Sept. 12, 2014
Richmond Today and Tomorrow
In this wide-ranging, half-hour discussion (at 33:35 in KPFA's archive), guest-host Marie Choi asks Mike Parker and Andrés Soto about why Mike withdrew from the mayoral race, Chevron's candidates, the role of social movements, the status and future of Chevron's refinery, progressive strategy, our opposition, the main issue in the 2014 race, and beyond.
Marie Choi: As November elections approach, we're turning our attention to Richmond, California, where the Richmond Progressive Alliance is battling oil-giant Chevron for control of the City Council. For many of us outside of Richmond, the RPA has been an example of what's possible when an independent grassroots organization gains council seats and pushes through a progressive agenda. Through a combination of grassroots-mobilization and holding key council positions, the RPA and its allies have won major concessions from Chevron, defended homeowners from bank foreclosures, and changed the city's approach to policing. We're talking this morning with Mike Parker and Andrés Soto, they are members of the Richmond Progressive Alliance, and Mike was until recently a mayoral candidate for Richmond, California.
An Interview with Mayor Gayle
Political Decisions from the Heart
by Robert "Han" Bishop
How did Richmond go from being a Chevron company town to the most progressive city in the San Francisco Bay Area?
Why is it so difficult for politicians to make decisions from the heart, even ones who are well-meaning?
Why is the upcoming election critical in preventing Chevron manipulation of the democratic process, and returning Richmond to the past where Chevron always gets what they want, regardless of public safety concerns and increased environmental pollution?
What does it mean to raise human consciousness as a public official?
These and other important issues are addressed in my (16 min) interview with Gayle McLaughlin, the Mayor of Richmond, California.
More Video Showing How Wrong Bates is for Richmond
Nat Bates Promotes Drivers License Check Points that Target Latinos
Richmond used to be noted for its murder. Now it is noted for how it has reduced violence. Mayoral candidate Nat Bates's main program for safety is to return the city to the policies that build distrust between the largest ethnic group in the city (40% Latino) and the police. Bates is the Chevron candidate for Mayor, who has enabled hate-speech at Council meetings.
"That Wily Corporation"
What Could Chevron be Up To?
by Patsy Byers
The SF Weekly recently published a profile of one of the chief "spin doctors" for Chevron, Sam Singer, which gives insights into his methods of damage-control and opinion-shaping. With the August 6, 2012 explosion and fire at the Chevron Richmond refinery, he was probably busy before the first patient had been seen at Doctors Medical Center.
In contrast to Singer, Albany resident John Irminger displayed this understanding of Chevron's operations, published as a letter to the editor on Wednesday in the El Cerrito Journal (emphasis added):
"In addition to financing the campaigns of local politicians, Chevron does million-dollar sweet things all over the East Bay. So people love Chevron.
"But, that wily corporation then finagles hundreds of millions of dollars in tax breaks and property devaluations that primarily affect the ability of local governments to fulfill the needs of their constituents.
"Chevron's strategy ensures it always has some friendly politicians, and that prominent and influential people, especially in charities and education, are dependent on Chevron for their programs. Thus, they (understandably) sing the praises of their benefactor.
"These are the tentacles of power -- pulling us the wrong way.
"Let's not forget that Chevron's primary motivation is to make money by refining increasingly toxic oil sources, and is spending billions to do this. This is not planet—or life—friendly energy investment..."
A recent Buzzflash for Truthout article nicely fleshes out the premise of its title: "Chevron: Global Bandit, Local Bully," but its concluding paragraphs show a stunning lack of awareness by the local media people it cites:
"As KQED's Tara Siler and Molly Samuel recently observed: 'What, exactly, is coming up on Chevron's agenda in Richmond is an open question.'
"The Contra Costa Times' Robert Rogers told KQED that 'The modernization plan was a major hurdle, and Chevron passed it. What they foresee as being an issue in which their interests could perhaps be decided by the council is relatively unknown.'"
Have they forgotten the lawsuit the City of Richmond has brought against Chevron for damages, including the August 6th disaster? I bet Chevron and Sam Singer remember it. Isn't it likely that City Council will be making decisions about that in the next 4 years? Wouldn't it be a whole lot more profitable for Chevron to have a council that's comfortable with Richmond once again being a company town? With councilmembers who are themselves in the role of dependents, colluding to undermine legitimate public power?
Let's elect a city council that is willing to challenge the power plays of Chevron! Let's get a council that will implement the life-friendly suggestion with which John Irminger concluded his letter: "If cloudy, high-latitude Germany makes solar its priority, the sunny United States surely can also."
SF Chronicle on "the Chevron Candidates"
Chevron Pouring Money into Richmond Election
by Chip Johnson
Chevron, the city's main employer and taxpayer, is also the biggest spender on political campaigns - it set aside $1.6 million in a political action committee called Moving Forward that supports the oil giant's favorite City Council and mayoral candidates.
Let me repeat: $1.6 million. For local elections in a city of a little over 106,000 residents...
Despite all the money thrown around by this corporate giant, it's clear not all of Richmond's residents are so easily swayed by swag. But that's not stopping Chevron from trying to influence the outcome of a city election.
Change is coming to Richmond, slow but steady. Crime is way down, development is on the way up, and the city needs to shed its historical reputation as a "company" town.
Surpassing Our Goal: Over 1,000 Homes
Richmond Rising a Rousing Success
Thanks to all of our volunteers for their amazing efforts in support of a progressive Richmond, many of whom joined in from the Sunflower Alliance or the Our Power national convening. Reports say the after-party was good food, good jazz (featuring Andrés Soto on saxophone), and a good time!
The next all-day mass-mobilization canvassing event will be on Saturday, Sept. 6, 9:30am, at the Bobby Bowens Progressive Center, 1021 Macdonald Ave, near Harbour.
Or sign up here for our regular Canvasser Workshop, Saturdays at 3pm, also at the BBPC.
Volunteers Needed to Help Coordinate Canvassing
Maintain the Momentum of Richmond Rising
by Janet Johnson
Right now we need volunteers for two projects:
Won't you help us win our campaign for a better Richmond? Many hands make light work, and the work we do now will send ripples far beyond our town. Please join us! Email us and let us know when you're available.
Chevron Candidates Revealed
Chevron Starts with $1.6 Million to Buy City Council
by Mike Parker
Chevron has already given $1.6 Million to its campaign organization to elect Chevron's favored candidates: Nat Bates as mayor and Charles Ramsey, Donna Powers, and Al Martinez to the Richmond City Council.
Here is the official filing. Chevron has already laid out $63,000 for the first phase of a billboard blitz.
These candidates will all doubtless thank Chevron while insisting that they are independent and have offered Chevron nothing in exchange. Sure.
SF Chronicle on "Anybody but Bates"
United Front Against Bates
by Chip Johnson
Try "Anybody but Bates" - as in Richmond councilman Nat Bates, who is running for mayor.
Bates, 82, is a longtime political presence in Richmond, a walking, talking anachronism who has held office, not continuously, since 1967, including two stints as mayor in the late 1970s.
In the opinion of his rivals, a Bates victory represents a step back in time - and in the wrong direction.
So on Friday, Richmond Progressive Alliance candidate Mike Parker withdrew his candidacy and veteran City Council member Tom Butt announced his mayoral campaign. Uche Uwahemu, a local business owner, is also running for the seat.
The concern among the city's political leaders is that if Parker and Butt split the city's liberal vote, it could provide an opportunity for Bates to win - and both Butt and Parker believe that is something that must be prevented.
Concentrating our Energies toward Progressive Governance
Mike Parker Withdraws from Mayoral Race
After five months of vigorous campaigning for the office of Richmond Mayor, I am withdrawing from the race. A few days before the final filing deadline, I learned that Tom Butt had decided to enter the race.
My supporters and I determined that in this race the progressive vote would likely be split. We decided my time is better spent campaigning for our team of progressive candidates for the Richmond City Council, Jovanka Beckles, Eduardo Martinez, and Gayle McLaughlin.
Taken together Gayle, Eduardo, and Jovanka, and the many campaign supporters behind them, represent a different kind of politics, based on organized people-power—not on corporate power.
I am still an active part of “Team Richmond.” I will work very hard to continue the progress we have made in Richmond and to elect members of the Council who support the fight for Doctors Hospital, a cleaner and safer refinery, jobs for Richmond, and rebuilding our system of public education through community involvement. We need to challenge the Chevron candidates and those unwilling to stand up against Chevron when representing the community.
In the course of this campaign, I have met and been inspired by many wonderful Richmond residents. I thank all those volunteers, unions, and community organizations who have endorsed me and especially those volunteers who worked so hard to make my campaign an exciting grass roots effort. I know we can continue the same spirit and energy to make Team Richmond a success.
In gratitude and solidarity
Jovanka Beckles Profiled in the SF Chronicle
Councilwoman Perseveres through Taunts, Rants and Homophobic Slurs
by Carolyn Jones
Mark Wassberg took to the podium, wagged his finger at the Richmond City Council and said:
"I'm going to keep coming up here and tell you how gays have no morality... You're filth. You're dirt. Because I have the constitutional right to say it."
The comments during a July meeting of the council were directed at Vice Mayor Jovanka Beckles, the city's first openly lesbian councilwoman. She sighed and listened impassively. After all, she'd heard it all before. For four years.
Mike Parker Comments
While we need to protect free speech, we need to also make it clear that there is no support for the enablers and apologists for this kind of hate speech. My opponent for Mayor, Councilmember Nat Bates, regularly gives support to Wassberg and others and attacks Mayor McLaughlin when she tries to establish order.
A Richmonder Speaks Truth to Power at SFGate
Slick Chevron Campaign to Control Richmond
by David Helvarg
If the Supreme Court is right that corporations are people and money is free speech, then Chevron is the biggest loudmouth in Richmond, where I live.
When people think of unlimited campaign spending, they tend to think of national elections, but the most insidious impacts may be taking place at the state and municipal levels. I know Chevron contributes to our local economy because it disbursed more than $2 million in city election campaign money since 2010, or roughly $50 each on me and every other registered voter in our small city of 106,000. The company provides jobs not only at its sprawling Richmond oil refinery but also for public relations, printers and a private detective who was hired a few years ago to smear the mayor.
Chevron wants to get rid of our Green Party mayor and progressive City Council majority because they've challenged the company on property taxes and pollution. That's why in 2012 Chevron spent $422,000 backing a single candidate for one of the seven council seats that pays $16,830 a year. The company wants to return to the days when the council majority was known as the "Chevron 5."
Add Your Own Endorsement Today
Recent Endorsements for Team Richmond
Recently Team Richmond has received endorsements from these fine folks:
The one from the Wellstone Democratic Renewal Club is notable since it's the first time they've supported a slate that is not affiliated with the Democratic Party.
Read about ILWU support for the Maritime Union of Australia in their battle against Chevron's attacks on labor, including their recent meeting with Gayle McLaughlin and Mike Parker.
If you have not already done so, please add your name to the list of endorsers for Team Richmond candidates: Mike Parker for Mayor, Jovanka Beckles, Eduardo Martinez, and Gayle McLaughlin for City Council. Send us a brief e-mail with "Endorse Team Richmond" in the subject line. Include your full name, city of residence, and any affiliation or title you would like to include (for identification purposes only). It's free and easy. Your taking this step to support Team Richmond will really be appreciated. Thank you!
Team Richmond Needs More Canvassers
Encouragement from an Active Canvasser
by Jeanne Kortz
The Progressives have changed Richmond for the better. I cannot imagine what will happen to Richmond if Nat Bates, Chevron’s candidate for mayor, or Charles Ramsey, the corporate special interests’ candidate, wins. Richmond will fall back to the dark ages of corporate cronyism. Nat Bates consistently supports Chevron and other corporate interests over community interests, and he will have the advantage of Chevron’s billboards, TV ads and mailers. Charles Ramsey wants Richmond to be another Silicon Valley, a poster child for income and housing inequality with the cost of living skyrocketing. His campaign has the deep pockets of the building trades (Chevron’s “Modernization” Project with pollution increases intact) and other special interest groups.
The Richmond Progressive Alliance and the Team Richmond candidates don’t have those kinds of deep pockets. What we have is people power which we need to utilize by getting supporters out to canvass their neighborhoods. I’ve had the pleasure of canvassing with Mike Parker, our progressive candidate for Mayor, a number of times over the past two months. The canvassing has been a wonderful, positive experience. People are very receptive to our cause, especially if you tell them that the Team Richmond candidates take no corporate donations, and are beholden only to the citizens of Richmond.
I realize that some of you might feel somewhat intimidated by canvassing. I felt that way myself, but once I experienced the openness and friendliness of most people who answer their doors, I was no longer intimated, but enthusiastic and hopeful.
I want to encourage everyone who cares about the Richmond election in November to get out and canvass for our progressive candidates. Richmond is better now, and we must continue with the positive changes that have been made possible by our progressive majority on the city council.
Please consider canvassing your neighborhood, or coming to canvass with a Richmond resident if you are from a neighboring town. Team Richmond holds canvasser trainings to get people started at 11am every 2nd Saturday and every 4th Sunday of the month at the RPA office on Macdonald. You can sign up through the Team Richmond canvassing page. Your contribution as a canvasser will really make a difference in this important election and ensure that Richmond continues to improve.
—Jeanne Kortz, Richmond Resident and RPA Member
If you are interested in canvassing or have questions about it, please contact Alex Early by phone: 617-816-4260 or by email: email@example.com.
Trained or experienced canvassers who would like to walk with Team Richmond candidates Mike Parker (for Mayor) or Eduardo Martinez (for City Council) may choose a convenient day, usually from 4-6pm, by signing up here.
Don’t Miss this Article in The Nation
RPA Making History
Journalist, author, and Richmonder Steve Early raises our struggle to national attention.
In 2006, California progressives won control of City Hall. Now Chevron and its allies are spending plenty to get it back.
What We Lack in Capital We’ll Make Up in Creativity
If I Had a Billboard
And we do have a classic billboard at 23rd & Garvin. Check it out!
Help Wanted: Team Richmond is Looking for
Photographers, Calendar & Housing Coordinators
Join our team of photographers. We could publish a list of events we know candidates will attend from which team photographers could choose according to their own schedules. That way we could capture the candidates in action for publication in print and social media.
Point and shoot, camera phone, high tech expensive camera? No matter. They all take fine photographs for our purposes. Then, all you would do is email the photos in. Photo credits given, if you like.
If interested, please contact firstname.lastname@example.org.
Calendar coordinator: We need someone who will keep track of events where our candidates and campaign volunteers need to speak or hand out literature. The work can be done from home, largely through email.
Housing coordinator: Help place out-of-area campaign volunteers with volunteer hosts.
If you’re interested in either coordinator job, please call Mike Parker at 510-334-3001, or email him at MikeParkerforRichmond@gmail.com
Quick, Easy and Free!
Endorse Team Richmond Now
As you know, 2014 is going to be a super important election here in Richmond, if we want to keep the progressive momentum going and keep building on the good things happening in recent years. You’ve probably noticed how Chevron is already spending tons of money on PR…
Here’s a free and easy way to show support for Team Richmond. Your endorsement is valuable and will make a difference! Please let us know if you endorse the Team Richmond candidates: Mike Parker for Mayor and Jovanka Beckles, Eduardo Martinez and Gayle McLaughlin for City Council.
Simply send a brief email to email@example.com, with “endorse Team Richmond” in the subject line. Include your full name, city of residence, and any affiliation or title you would like to include (affiliation is for identification purposes only).
Thank you. It only takes a moment and will be greatly appreciated!
Misinformation from Chevron Canvassers
by Daniel Goodwin
Open Letter to Chevron
It seems unlikely that the City would be co-sponsoring a Chevron canvasser, so I immediately pressed him on this joint-contract claim: "You mean the City of Richmond is financially supporting this?"
"That's what they told us," the canvasser replied. This wasn't an offhand claim: it was the first thing he said, and he clarified that he was told to say it.
Appeal to Richmond Residents
Have you experienced similar encounters with Chevron's Richmond Proud or 4Richmond neighborhood or telephone canvassers? Please don't get frustrated with the canvassers; they're bright young folks just trying to make a living, and someday they'll be on our side. You can help by sharing your story with your neighbors. Call us at 510-412-2260 or write to RPAActivist@gmail.com to tell us about it.
Mike Parker enters the race for Mayor; Mayor Gayle McLaughlin, Vice Mayor Jovanka Beckles, and Planning Commissioner Eduardo Martinez to run for City Council seats
All articles on the RPA website and in the RPA Activist newsletter represent the views of the author. Unsigned text represents the views of the newsletter editor, Patsy Byers, not necessarily those of the RPA. Differing views are welcome. Copyright 2016. Articles may be reprinted by not-for-profit organizations citing authors and source. Send email to RPAActivist@gmail.com